DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: how much cheaper is DeepSeek really?
DeepSeek's entire pitch is price. The numbers are dramatic — but are you comparing like for like?
DeepSeek's entire pitch is price. The numbers are dramatic — but are you comparing like for like?
DeepSeek V4
GPT-6
Value verdict: on intelligence per $1, DeepSeek currently comes out ahead — 218,182 vs 13,250. Prices move often, so recheck the calculator regularly.
| DeepSeek | ChatGPT | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Flagship model | DeepSeek V4 Pro | GPT-6 Astra |
| Input / 1M | $0.66 | $10 |
| Output / 1M | $1.98 | $50 |
| Intelligence index | 36 | 53 |
| Tokens / $1 | 606.1k | 25.0k |
| Intelligence / $1 | 218,182 | 13,250 |
| Cheapest plan | — | ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo) |
DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.66 input / $1.98 output per 1M tokens at off-peak hours (peak is 2x). GPT-6 Astra costs $10 / $50. On output tokens alone DeepSeek is roughly 25x cheaper off-peak — about 12x at peak. Even against OpenAI's cheaper GPT-5.6 Sol ($4 / $20) it is 10x cheaper on output, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash drops to $0.15 / $0.60.
Because the price is so low, DeepSeek's intelligence-per-dollar score dominates the calculator. That is a real advantage for high-volume workloads where raw throughput matters more than the last few percentage points of quality.
DeepSeek wins on cost per token by a landslide. OpenAI wins on ecosystem maturity and, for many teams, on output quality and tooling. If your workload is bulk and cost-sensitive, DeepSeek is hard to beat.
Bottom line: DeepSeek is the rational choice for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads; ChatGPT justifies its price with ecosystem maturity and, for many teams, output quality. For pure tokens per dollar, DeepSeek wins.